Pengaruh Variasi Jarak Baut Terhadap Perilaku Geser Balok Beton Bertulang yang diperkuat dengan Panel Mortar Geopolimer

Fakhruddin Fakhruddin; Rita Irmawaty; Rudy Djamaluddin; Radix Dwi Wardhana

doi:10.29103/tj.v13i2.873

Pengaruh Variasi Jarak Baut Terhadap Perilaku Geser Balok Beton Bertulang yang diperkuat dengan Panel Mortar Geopolimer

Fakhruddin Fakhruddin, Rita Irmawaty, Rudy Djamaluddin, Radix Dwi Wardhana

Abstract

Abstrak

Penelitian ini menyajikan perilaku balok beton bertulang yang diperkuat dengan panel mortar geopolimer dan serat Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA). Benda uji terdiri atas 3 buah balok dengan dimensi 150x300 mm dan panjang 2300 mm. Panel mortar geopolimer dipasang pada bentang geser balok beton bertulang dengan variasi jarak antar baut 200 mm (GM-200) dan 300 mm (GM-300). Hasil penelitian dibandingkan berdasarkan pendekatan beban-lendutan, beban maksimum, perilaku beban regangan tulangan dan beton, dan pola retak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kapasitas geser balok meningkat sebesar 34.98% (GM-W-200) dan 28.81% (GM-W-300) dibandingkan dengan balok kontrol (CB). Selain itu, variasi jarak baut juga berpengaruh signifikan terhadap pola kegagalan balok. Balok dengan jarak antar baut 200 mm menunjukan pola kegagalan lentur dan daktail, sementara balok dengan jarak antar baut 300 mm menunjukan pola kegagalan geser yang getas.

Kata kunci: beton bertulang, jarak antar baut , mortar geopolimer, perkuatan

Abstract

This study presents the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with geopolymer mortar panels and Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) fibers. fibers. The specimens consist of three RC beams with dimensions of 150x300 mm and length of 2300 mm. Geopolymer mortar panels are installed on shear spans of RC beams with variations in the distance between the bolts of 200 mm (GM-W-200) and 300 mm (GM-W-300). The study results were compared with the control beam (CB) without strengthening. The shear behavior of the beams was discussed based on the load-deflection behavior, the maximum load, the reinforcement and concrete stress-strain behavior, and the crack pattern. The results indicated that the shear capacity of the strengthened beams increased by 34.98% (GM-W-200) and 28.81% (GM-W-300) compared to the control beam (CB). In addition, differences in bolt spacing had a significant influenceon beam failure patterns. Beams with a bolt sapcing of 200 mm exhibited ductile bendingfailure, whereas beams with a bolt spacing of 300 mm showed brittle shear failure.

Keywords: bolt spacing, mortar geopolymer, reinforced concrete, reinforcement

Keywords

bolt spacing, mortar geopolymer, reinforced concrete, reinforcement

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmed, S.F.U., Maalej, M. and Paramasivam, P. (2007) ‘Flexural responses of hybrid steel-polyethylene fiber reinforced cement composites containing high volume fly ash’, Construction and Building Materials, 21(5), pp. 1088–1097. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.01.002.

Al-Majidi, M.H. et al. (2019) ‘Flexural performance of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with fibre reinforced geopolymer concrete under accelerated corrosion’, Structures, 19, pp. 394–410. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.02.005.

Alomayri, T., Shaikh, F.U.A. and Low, I.M. (2013) ‘Thermal and mechanical properties of cotton fabric-reinforced geopolymer composites’, Journal of Materials Science, 48(19), pp. 6746–6752. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7479-2.

Alzeer, M. and MacKenzie, K. (2013) ‘Synthesis and mechanical properties of novel composites of inorganic polymers (geopolymers) with unidirectional natural flax fibres (phormium tenax)’, Applied Clay Science, 75–76, pp. 148–152. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2013.03.010.

ASTM C39/C39 M-01 (2001) ‘Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens’, Annual Book of ASTM Standards [Preprint].

ASTM C496 (2008) ‘Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens’, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, pp. 545-545–3.

Davidovits, J. (2008) Geopolymer CHemistry and Applications, 5th edition, J. Davidovits.–Saint-Quentin, France. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265076752.

Duxson, P. et al. (2007) ‘The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of “green concrete”’, Cement and Concrete Research, 37(12), pp. 1590–1597. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018.

Ekaputri, J.J. et al. (2021) ‘Improving Geopolymer Characteristics with Addition of Poly-Vinyl Alcohol (PVA) Fibers’, Civil Engineering Dimension, 23(1), pp. 28–34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.23.1.28-34.

Fakhruddin, F., Irmawaty, R. and Putri, J.J.E. (2023) ‘External Shear Strengthening of RC Beams with Anchored Geopolymer Fiber Mortar Panel: An Experimental Study’, Materials Science Forum, 1091, pp. 93–100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-1tdbui.

Fernández-Jiménez, A. et al. (2008) ‘Alkaline activation of metakaolin-fly ash mixtures: Obtain of Zeoceramics and Zeocements’, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 108(1–3), pp. 41–49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.03.024.

Firmo, J.P., Correia, J.R. and Bisby, L.A. (2015) ‘Fire behaviour of FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete structural elements: A state-of-the-art review’, Composites Part B: Engineering, 80, pp. 198–216. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.045.

Furqan, N. and Irmawaty, R. (2022) ‘IJEScA Flexural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Strengthening’, International Journal of Engineering and Science Applications [Preprint].

Hassan, A., Arif, M. and Shariq, M. (2019) ‘Use of geopolymer concrete for a cleaner and sustainable environment – A review of mechanical properties and microstructure’, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 704–728. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.051.

He, P. et al. (2010) ‘Effects of high-temperature heat treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced geopolymer composites’, Ceramics International, 36(4), pp. 1447–1453. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.02.012.

Irmawaty, R., Fakhruddin and Ekaputri, J.J. (2022) ‘Experimental and analytical study for shear strengthening of reinforced-concrete beams using a prefabricated geopolymer–mortar panel’, Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01568.

Khoeri, H. (2020) ‘Pemilihan Metode Perbaikan Dan Perkuatan Struktur Akibat Gempa (Studi Kasus Pada Bank Sulteng Palu)’, Jurnal Konstruksia, 12(1), pp. 93–104.

Nath, P. and Sarker, P.K. (2017) ‘Fracture properties of GGBFS-blended fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient temperature’, Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, 50(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0893-6.

Nematollahi, B. et al. (2014) ‘Properties of fresh and hardened glass fiber reinforced fly ash based geopolymer concrete’, in Key Engineering Materials. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, pp. 629–633. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.594-595.629.

SNI 2052:2017 (2017) ‘SNI 2052:2017 Baja tulangan beton’, Badan Standarisasi Nasional [Preprint]. Available at: www.bsn.go.id.

SNI 4431:2011 (2011) ‘SNI 4431:2011 Cara uji kuat lentur beton normal dengan dua titik pembebanan’, Badan Standarisasi Nasional [Preprint]. Available at: www.bsn.go.id.

Triwiyono, A. and Wikana, I. (2000) Kuat Geser Kolom Beton Bertulang Penampang Lingkaran yang Diperbaiki dengan Metode Concrete Jacketing. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29103/tj.v13i2.873