Potensi Penerapan Kebijakan Carbon Tax Pada Industri Konstruksi Indonesia
Abstract
Abstrak
Carbon tax merupakan kebijakan yang banyak diterapkan oleh berbagai negara sejak konvensi Protokol Kyoto. Kebijakan tersebut terbukti efektif untuk menurunkan emisi karbon yang saat ini menjadi permasalahan global. Saat ini, Indonesia berada pada tahap awal dalam penerapannya, ditandai adanya peraturan carbon tax yang resmi diberlakukan pada 29 Oktober 2021. Penelitian ini akan melihat pengaruh penerapan carbon tax khususnya pada industri konstruksi di negara-negara yang telah menerapkan sebelumnya dan melihat potensi penerapannya di Indonesia. Analisis SWOT digunakan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor internal maupun eksternal dalam penerapan kebijakan carbon tax. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan carbon tax dapat mendukung program pemerintah sebelumnya yaitu Skema Karbon Nusantara yang dapat mendukung pendanaan penerapan program pemerintah seperti green building dan infrastruktur berkelanjutan khususnya pada proyek-proyek pemerintah. Namun, perlu diperhatikan bahwa kebijakan carbon tax dapat berdampak buruk terhadap kondisi ekonomi sehingga diperlukan pemanfaatan sumber pendapatan pajak yang dapat mendukung usaha-usaha pencapaian target penurunan emisi GRK Indonesia.
Kata kunci: carbon tax, emisi karbon, kebijakan karbon, emisi CO2, karbon konstruksi
Abstract
A carbon tax is a policy that has been implemented by many countries since the Kyoto Protocol convention The policy is effectively implemented to reduce carbon emissions. Currently, Indonesia is in the early stages of implementing the policy, marked by the new carbon tax regulation which officially was enforced on 29 October 2021. This research aims to identify the effect of carbon tax implementation in the construction industry in several countries and analyze the potential for its application in Indonesia. The SWOT analysis was carried out to determine internal and external factors in the implementation of a carbon tax policy. The result shows that the policy can support the previous program by the Indonesian government, namely the Nusantara Carbon Scheme to promote the funding for other related programs such as green building and sustainable infrastructure. However, it should be noted that the policy may also have a negative impact on economics. Therefore, it is necessary to use tax revenue sources in achieving Indonesia's GHG emission reduction targets.
Keywords: carbon tax, carbon emissions, carbon policy, CO2 emissions, carbon construction
JeremiahKeywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amano, Y., Ito, K., Yoshida, S., Matsuo, K., Hashizume, T., Favrat, D., Maréchal, F., 2010. Impact analysis of carbon tax on the renewal planning of energy supply system for an office building. Energy 35, 1040–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.023
Anzalchi, A., Sarwat, A., 2015. Analysis of carbon tax as an incentive toward building sustainable grid with renewable energy utilization, in: IEEE Green Technologies Conference. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1109/GREENTECH.2015.42
Ayu, P., 2018. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies the Impact of Carbon Tax Application on the Economy and Environment of Indonesia 4. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejes.v4i1.p110-120
Azfar Muhammad, 2021. Pajak Karbon Berlaku Mulai 1 April 2022, Berikut Skema Pungutannya. IDX Channel.
Beck, M., Rivers, N., Wigle, R., Yonezawa, H., 2015a. Carbon tax and revenue recycling: Impacts on households in British Columbia. Resource and Energy Economics 41, 40–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.04.005
Beck, M., Rivers, N., Wigle, R., Yonezawa, H., 2015b. Carbon tax and revenue recycling: Impacts on households in British Columbia. Resource and Energy Economics 41, 40–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.04.005
Brodjonegoro, B.P.S., 2019. Pembangunan Rendah Karbon Indonesia.
Choudhri, A.F., Siddiqui, A., Khan, N.R., Cohen, H.L., 2015. Understanding bibliometric parameters and analysis. Radiographics 35, 736–746. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140036
Climate Transparency, 2020. Climate Transparency Report 2020 Indonesia.
Dian Kurniati, 2021. Terapkan Pajak Karbon, BKF: Indonesia Sejajar dengan Negara Maju. DDTC News.
Du, Q., Yan, Y., Huang, Y., Hao, C., Wu, J., 2021. Evolutionary games of low-carbon behaviors of construction stakeholders under carbon taxes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020508
Id, //Ojs Stiami Ac, Karbon, C., Pembangunan, U., Berwawasan, B., Keuangan, P., Stan, N., 2020. Meru Indra Kurnia Jati 7, 35–40.
Inoue, N., Matsumoto, S., Morita, M., 2021. Inequalities in the impact of the carbon tax in Japan, in: Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific. Springer Japan, pp. 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6964-7_12
Irama, A.B., 2019. Potensi Penerimaan Negara Dari Emisi Karbon: Langkah Optimis Mewujudkan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia.
Irama, A.B., Bebi Irama, A., 2020. Perdagangan Karbon di indonesia: Kajian Kelembagaan dan Keuangan Negara.
KEM PPKF, 2020. Kerangka Ekonomi Makro dan Pokok-Pokok Kebijakan Fiskal Tahun 2020 - Pemulihan Ekonomi dan Reformasi Struktural.
Kemenkeu RI, 2020. Indonesia Country Programme for The Green Climate Fund.
Li, J., Yuan, L., Jiang, W., 2019. Pricing and Green Technology Investment of Prefabricated Building Supply Chain with Carbon Tax. pp. 1429–1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93351-1_112
Li, N., Ma, D., Chen, W., 2015a. Projection of Cement Demand and Analysis of the Impacts of Carbon Tax on Cement Industry in China, in: Energy Procedia. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 1766–1771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.457
Li, N., Ma, D., Chen, W., 2015b. Projection of Cement Demand and Analysis of the Impacts of Carbon Tax on Cement Industry in China, in: Energy Procedia. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 1766–1771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.457
Lu, C., Tong, Q., Liu, X., 2010. The impacts of carbon tax and complementary policies on Chinese economy. Energy Policy 38, 7278–7285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.055
Metcalf, G.E., Weisbach, D., 2009. The design of a carbon tax. Harvard Environmental Law Review 33, 499–556. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1327260
Pahnael, J.R.N., Soekiman, A., Wimala, M., 2020. Penerapan Kebijakan Insentif Green Building di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Infrastruktur 6, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35814/infrastruktur.v6i1.1315
Paramita Rastri, Kusumawardhani Rosalina Tineke, 2020. Menakar Rencana Kebijakan Pajak Karbon.
Ploeg Frederick Van Der, Withagen Cees, 2014. Growth, renewables, and the optimal carbon tax. International Economic Review 55, 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12049
Richard S.J. Tol, 2001. Estimates of the damage costs of climate change. Environmental and Resource Economics 21, 135–160.
Royapoor M, du H, Wade N, Goldstein M, Roskilly T, Taylor P, Walker S, 2019. Carbon mitigation unit costs of building retrofits and the scope for carbon tax, a case study. Energy and Buildings 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109415
Shi, Q., Ren, H., Cai, W., Gao, J., 2019. How to set the proper level of carbon tax in the context of Chinese construction sector? A CGE analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117955
United Nations, 2015. Global Issues: Climate Change.
Wimala, M., Akmalah, E., Sururi, M.R., 2016. Breaking through the Barriers to Green Building Movement in Indonesia: Insights from Building Occupants, in: Energy Procedia. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.204
Wong, P.S.P., Lacarruba, N., Bray, A., 2013a. Can a Carbon Tax Push the Australian Construction Sector toward Self-Regulation? Lessons Learned from European Union Experiences. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943
Wong, P.S.P., Lacarruba, N., Bray, A., 2013b. Can a Carbon Tax Push the Australian Construction Sector toward Self-Regulation? Lessons Learned from European Union Experiences. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943
World Bank, 2017. Carbon Tax Guide.
Yusuf, A.A., Resosudarmo, B.P., 2015. On the distributional impact of a carbon tax in developing countries: the case of Indonesia. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 17, 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-014-0093-y
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29103/tj.v12i1.663
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Mia Wimala, Jannuar Yeremy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons "Attribution-ShareAlike”
Attibusion Internasional (CC BY-SA 4.0)
March and September
In cooperation with Ikatan Sarjana Teknik Sipil (ISATSI NAD) Lhokseumawe