Evaluasi Siklus Hidup Bangunan Ramah Lingkungan Dalam Mencapai Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan

dian laras wati; Oei Fuk Jin

doi:10.29103/tj.v14i2.1121

Evaluasi Siklus Hidup Bangunan Ramah Lingkungan Dalam Mencapai Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan

dian laras wati, Oei Fuk Jin

Abstract

Abstrak

Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kontribusi bangunan ramah lingkungan dalam mencapai tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan (Sustainable development goals/SDGs) melalui analisis siklus hidupnya. Dengan latar belakang pentingnya bangunan ramah lingkungan dalam mengurangi dampak lingkungan dan meningkatkan efisiensi sumber daya, penelitian ini menggunakan metode tinjauan sistematik literatur untuk mengumpulkan dan menganalisis makalah terkait bangunan ramah lingkungan, penilaian siklus hidup proyek, dan aspek keberlanjutan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa bangunan ramah lingkungan mampu mengurangi emisi karbon, mengoptimalkan penggunaan energi, dan memberikan manfaat ekonomi jangka panjang. Dengan demikian, implementasi bangunan ramah lingkungan dapat berperan penting dalam mencapai tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan melalui integrasi aspek lingkungan, ekonomi, dan sosial.

Kata kunci: Bangunan ramah lingkungan, penilaian siklus hidup, dampak lingkungan, dampak ekonomi, pembangunan berkelanjutan

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the contribution of environmentally friendly buildings to achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through life cycle analysis. Given the crucial role of environmentally friendly buildings in reducing environmental impact and enhancing resource efficiency, this research employs a systematic literature review method to gather and analyze papers related to environmentally friendly buildings, project life cycle assessment, and sustainability aspects. The analysis results indicate that environmentally friendly buildings can reduce carbon emissions, optimize energy use, and provide long-term economic benefits. Thus, the implementation of environmentally friendly buildings can play a significant role in achieving sustainable development goals through the integration of environmental, economic, and social aspects.

Keywords: Green building, life cycle assessment, environmental impact, economic impact, sustainable development

Keywords

Green building, life cycle assessment, environmental impact, economic impact, sustainable development

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmad, T., Aibinu, A.A. and Stephan, A. (2019) ‘Managing green building development – A review of current state of research and future directions’, Building and Environment, 155(March), pp. 83–104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.034.

Alaloul, W.S. et al. (2021) ‘Systematic review of life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis for pavement and a case study’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(8), pp. 1–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084377.

Araújo, J.P.C., Oliveira, J.R.M. and Silva, H.M.R.D. (2014) ‘The importance of the use phase on the LCA of environmentally friendly solutions for asphalt road pavements’, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 32, pp. 97–110. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.07.006.

Benoît, C., Norris, G.A., Valdivia, S., Ciroth, A., Moberg, A., Bos, U., Prakash, S., Ugaya, C., Beck, T. (2010) ‘The Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products: Just in Time!’, International Journal Life Cycle Assessement., 15, 156–163.

Chen, X. and Wang, H. (2018) ‘Life cycle assessment of asphalt pavement recycling for greenhouse gas emission with temporal aspect’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, pp. 148–157. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.207.

Darko, A. and Chan, A.P.C. (2016) ‘Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals’, Habitat International, 57, pp. 53–63. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.07.001.

Economics, B. C. I. (2014). ‘Green Building Market Report Australia/New Zealand 2014’. Australia: BCI Economics.

Flynn, K.M. and Traver, R.G. (2013) ‘Green infrastructure life cycle assessment: A bio-infiltration case study’, Ecological Engineering, 55, pp. 9–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.01.004.

Gan, X. et al. (2015) ‘Why sustainable construction? Why not? An owner’s perspective’, Habitat International, 47, pp. 61–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.005.

Goh, C.S., Su, F. and Rowlinson, S. (2023) ‘Exploring Economic Impacts of Sustainable Construction Projects on Stakeholders: The Role of Integrated Project Delivery’, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 15(3), pp. 1–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-963.

Hwang, B.G., Zhao, X. and Yu, G.S. (2016) ‘Risk identification and allocation in underground rail construction joint ventures: contractors’ perspective’, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(6), pp. 758–767. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.914095.

ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 14040, (2006) ‘Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-General Principles and Framework’ ISO 14040, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jagarajan, R. et al. (2017) ‘Green retrofitting – A review of current status, implementations and challenges’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67(September 2015), pp. 1360–1368. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.091.

Koc, K., Kunkcu, H. and Gurgun, A.P. (2023) ‘A Life Cycle Risk Management Framework for Green Building Project Stakeholders’, Journal of Management in Engineering, 39(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-5361.

Liberalesso, T. et al. (2020) ‘Green infrastructure and public policies: An international review of green roofs and green walls incentives’, Land Use Policy, 96(June 2019), p. 104693. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104693.

Lin, S., Li, K. and Cheung, S. (2023) ‘Managing Disputes for a Sustainable Construction: A Perspective of Settlement Facilitating Elements in Negotiations’, Buildings, 13(10). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102578.

Liu, T. et al. (2022) ‘Sustainability Considerations of Green Buildings: A Detailed Overview on Current Advancements and Future Considerations’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(21), pp. 1–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114393.

Musarat, M.A. et al. (2021) ‘The effect of inflation rate on CO2 emission: A framework for malaysian construction industry’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), pp. 1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031562.

Nguyen, H.D. and Macchion, L. (2023) ‘Risk management in green building: a review of the current state of research and future directions’, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(3), pp. 2136–2172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02168-y.

Qin, X., Mo, Y. and Jing, L. (2016) ‘Risk perceptions of the life-cycle of green buildings in China’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, pp. 148–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.103.

Santos, J. et al. (2018) ‘Life cycle assessment of low temperature asphalt mixtures for road pavement surfaces: A comparative analysis’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138(July), pp. 283–297. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.012.

Shanmugam, S., C. Sun, X. Zeng, and Y.-R. Wu. (2018) ‘High-efficient Pro- duction of Biobutanol by a Novel Clostridium sp. Strain wst with Uncon- trolled ph Strategy’, Bioresource Technology. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018. 02.077.

Srivastava, S., Raniga, U.I. and Misra, S. (2022) ‘A Methodological Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Construction Projects Incorporating TBL and Decoupling Principles’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1), pp. 1–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010197.

Wang, Z. et al. (2018) ‘Hierarchical life-cycle design of reinforced concrete structures incorporating durability, economic efficiency and green objectives’, Engineering Structures, 157(April 2017), pp. 119–131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.022.

Wu, P. et al. (2015) ‘A review of benchmarking in carbon labelling schemes for building materials’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, pp. 108–117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.067.

Wu, Y. et al. (2024) ‘Evaluating the economic sustainability of commercial complex greening based on cost-benefit analysis: A case study of Singapore’s Shaw center’, Ecological Indicators, 161(September 2023), p. 111890. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111890.

Wu, Z. et al. (2021) ‘A topical network based analysis and visualization of global research trends on green building from 1990 to 2020’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 320(March), p. 128818. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128818.

Xia, N. et al. (2018) ‘Towards integrating construction risk management and stakeholder management: A systematic literature review and future research agendas’, International Journal of Project Management, 36(5), pp. 701–715. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.006.

Xu, C. et al. (2017) ‘Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of a LID-BMP treatment train system: A case study in China’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, pp. 227–237. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.086.

Xu, C. et al. (2021) ‘Environmental and economic benefit comparison between coupled grey-green infrastructure system and traditional grey one through a life cycle perspective’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 174, p. 105804. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105804.

Yang, R. et al. (2015) ‘Environmental and economic analyses of recycled asphalt concrete mixtures based on material production and potential performance’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, pp. 141–151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.014.

Yang, R.J. and Zou, P.X.W. (2014) ‘Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: A social network model’, Building and Environment, 73, pp. 208–222. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.014.

Yang, R.J., Zou, P.X.W. and Wang, J. (2016) ‘Modelling stakeholder-associated risk networks in green building projects’, International Journal of Project Management, 34(1), pp. 66–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.010.

Zhao, X. et al. (2019) ‘A bibliometric review of green building research 2000–2016’, Architectural Science Review, 62(1), pp. 74–88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2018.1485548.

Zhu, J. et al. (2013) ‘Optimization method for building envelope design to minimize carbon emissions of building operational energy consumption using orthogonal experimental design (OED)’, Habitat International, 37, pp. 148–154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.006.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/tj.v14i2.1121