Kajian Penentuan Kuat Tekan Beton Berdasarkan Nilai Pantul Palu Dengan Memvariasikan Pola Titik Pantul

I Gusti Ngurah Eka Partama; Ni Putu Silvi; I Gusti Made Sudika

doi:10.29103/tj.v13i1.838

Kajian Penentuan Kuat Tekan Beton Berdasarkan Nilai Pantul Palu Dengan Memvariasikan Pola Titik Pantul

I Gusti Ngurah Eka Partama, Ni Putu Silvi, I Gusti Made Sudika

Abstract

Abstrak

Indikasi kekuatan tekan beton dapat ditentukan dengan Destructive Test (DT) dan Non-Destruktive Test (NDT). Core Drill (CD) termasuk DT dapat menyebabkan perlemahan kekuatan elemen struktur namun hasilnya dapat menginformasikan mutu beton yang representatif. Hammer Test (HT) relatif mudah dilaksanakan namun hasilnya sering dipertanyakan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendapatkan formulasi kuat tekan dalam fungsi nilai pantul palu dengan eksperimen menggunakan pelat beton ukuran 30x75x15 cm dengan komposisi berat 1PCC:2,697Ps:2,201 Kr, w/c sebesar 0,5. HT pola segiempat dan radial dilakukan setelah beton mengeras. Spesimen silinder 80x150 mm diambil dengan CD pada umur 14, 21, 28 dan 35 hari selanjutnya diuji tekan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan untuk HT α sebesar 90^o pola segiempat, kuat tekan dengan formulasi , Rn rerata nilai pantul pusat dan empat pada sudut bujur sangkar dengan sisi minimum 3,6 cm, serta dalam pola radial dengan formulasi , Rn rerata nilai pantul pada pusat pengujian dan 4 lainnya keliling merata dalam radius minimum 2,5cm dari pusat.

Kata kunci: Kuat tekan beton, hammer test, core drill, destructive test, non- destructive test

Abstract

Indication of concrete compressive strength can be determined by Destructive Test (DT) and Non-Destructive Test (NDT). Core Drill (CD) including DT can cause a weakening of the strength of structural elements, but the results can inform representative concrete quality. The Hammer Test (HT) is relatively easy to perform, but the results are often questionable. This study aims to obtain the formulation of compressive strength in terms of hammer reflection value, by experimenting with a concrete plate measuring 30x75x15 cm with a weight composition of 1PCC:2.697Ps:2.201Kr, w/c as 0.5. HT rectangular and radial patterns are carried out after the concrete hardens. Cylindrical specimens of 80x150 mm were taken with a CD at the age of 14, 21, 28 and 35 days and then compressed. This study concludes that for HT α as-90^o quadrilateral pattern, compressive strength with the formulation , Rn mean central and four reflected values at the corners of a square with a minimum side of 3.6cm, as well as in a pattern radial with the formulation , Rn is the average reflectance value at the center of the test and the other 4 circumferences evenly within a minimum radius of 2.5cm from the center.

Keywords: Concrete compressive strength, Hammer Test, Core drill, Destructive Test, Non-Destructive Test.

Keywords

Concrete compressive strength, Hammer Test, Core drill, Destructive Test, Non-Destructive Test

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alwash, M., Breysse, D., Sbartaï, Z.M., Szilágyi, K., Borosnyói, A., 2017. Factors Affecting the Reliability of Assessing the Concrete Strength by Rebound Hammer and Cores. Constr. Build. Mater. 140, 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.129

ASTM, 2000. Standard Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete, ASTM International. Farmington Hills.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2011. SNI 1974-2011 : Cara Uji Kuat Tekan Beton dengan Benda Uji Silinder. Badan Stand. Nas. Indones. 20.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2010. RSNI 4803:20xx Metode Uji Angka Pantul Beton Keras (ASTM C 805-02), Badan Standardisasi Nasional Indonesianal.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2002. SNI 03-2942-2002 : Metode Pengambilan dan Pengujian Beton Inti.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2000. SNI 03-2834-2000: Tata cara pembuatan rencana campuran beton normal. Badan Stand. Nas. Indones. 1–34.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 1997. SNI-03-4430-1997 : Pengujian Hammer Test Tipe N dan NR.pdf.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 1994. SNI-03-3403-1994 : Metode Pengujian Kuat Tekan Beton Inti Pemboran.

Brencich, A., Cassini, G., Pera, D., Riotto, G., 2013. Calibration and Reliability of the Rebound (Schmidt) Hammer Test. Civ. Eng. Archit. 1, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2013.010303

Breysse, D., Balayssac, J.P., Biondi, S., Corbett, D., Goncalves, A., Grantham, M., Luprano, V.A.M., Masi, A., Monteiro, A.V., Sbartai, Z.M., 2019. Recommendation of RILEM TC249-ISC on Non Destructive in Situ Strength Assessment of Concrete. Mater. Struct. Constr. 52, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1369-2

Cheng, F.-H., 1998. Statics and Strength of Material, Second. ed. Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

Karundeng, V.S., Steenie E. Wallah, R.P., 2015. Penerapan Metode Schmidt Hammer Test dan Core Drilled Test untuk Evaluasi Kuat Tekan Beton pada Ruang IGD RSGM UNSRAT Guna Alih Fungsi Bangunan. Sipil Statik 3, 221–227.

Kementerian Pekerjaan umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, 2016. Pedoman Tata Cara Penentuan Campuran Beton Normal dengan Semen OPC, PPC dan PCC.pdf.

Kumavat, H.R., Chandak, N.R., Patil, I.T., 2021. Factors influencing the Performance of Rebound hammer used for non-Destructive Testing of Concrete Members: A Review. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 14, e00491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00491`

Neville, A.M., Brooks, J.J., 2010. Concrete Technology, 2nd Edition Book.pdf. Pearson.

Pawirodikromo, W., 2014. Analisis Tegangan Bahan. Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Ridho, F., Khoeri, H., 2015. Perbandingan Mutu Beton Hasil UPVT Metode Indirect Terhadap Mutu Beton Hasil Hammer Test dan Core Drill. J. Konstr. 6, 25–39.

Simatupang, R.M., Nuralinah, D., Remayanti, C., 2016. Korelasi Nilai Kuat Tekan Beton Antara Hammer Test, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) dan Compression Test. Rekayasa Sipil 10.

Soemono, 1985. Ilmu Gaya, Keenam. ed. Penerbit Djambatan, Bandung.

Sumajouw, A.J., Pandaleke, R., Wallah, S.E., 2018. Perbandingan Kuat Tekan Menggunakan Hammer Test pada Benda Uji Portal Beton Bertulang dan Menggunakan Mesin Uji Kuat Tekan pada Benda Uji Kubus. J. Sipil Statik 6

Szilágyi, K., Borosnyói, A., Mikó, T., 2013. Comparison of the Inherent Variability in Rebound Hammer Tests Performed with Different Testing Instruments. Epa. - J. Silic. Based Compos. Mater. 65, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2013.14

Szilágyi, K., Borosnyói, A., Zsigovics, I., 2015. Understanding the Rebound Surface Hardness of Concrete. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 21, 185–192. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802722

Teychenné, D.C., Franklin, R.E., Erntroy, H.C., 1997. Establishment Design of Normal Concrete Mixes, Second. ed. Construction Research Communications Ltd, London.

Yeşilmen, S., 2012. Evaluation of Rebound Hammer Test as a Combined Procedure Used with Drill Core Testing for Evaluation of Existing Structures. RILEM Bookseries 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0723-8_49

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/tj.v13i1.838