Analisis Keterlambatan Proyek Terhadap Cost Overruns Berbasis Project Risk Management Pada Proyek Pembangunan Infrastruktur Pabrik NPK Chemical PT Pupuk Iskandar Muda

teuku ikmal; Wesli Wesli; Maizuar Maizuar; Khairullah Khairullah; Hamzani Hamzani

doi:10.29103/tj.v14i1.1034

Analisis Keterlambatan Proyek Terhadap Cost Overruns Berbasis Project Risk Management Pada Proyek Pembangunan Infrastruktur Pabrik NPK Chemical PT Pupuk Iskandar Muda

teuku ikmal, Wesli Wesli, Maizuar Maizuar, Khairullah Khairullah, Hamzani Hamzani

Abstract

Abstrak

Proyek Pembangunan Pabrik NPK Chemical di PT PIM mengalami keterlambatan significant sehingga terjadi cost overrun. Penelitian ini untuk mengetahui banyaknya faktor risiko paling dominan dengan pendekatan Project Risk Management. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif dengan menyebarkan kuesioner kepada personil di proyek Pabrik NPK Chemical PT PIM. Data kuesioner diolah menggunakan programming SPSS. Setelah itu, dilakukan analisis penilaian risiko untuk memperoleh risiko keterlambatan yang dominan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan faktor risiko kategori “high risk” sebanyak 31 risiko atau berkontribusi sebesar 84,67%. Adapun 5 faktor risiko dominan penyebab keterlambatan proyek yaitu: Pengiriman material tidak sesuai sequential di lapangan; Mismanagement project Kontraktor; Keterlambatan karena pekerjaan subkontraktor; Mobilisasi sumberdaya yang lambat; serta Koordinasi dan komunikasi yang tidak baik antar bagian dalam organisasi kerja Kontraktor sehingga tidak dapat mengelola interface pekerjaan.

Kata kunci: Keterlambatan Proyek, Cost Overrun, Project Risk Management

Abstract

The NPK Chemical Plant Construction Project at PT PIM experienced significant delays resulting in cost overrun. This study is to determine the number of most dominant risk factors with the Project Risk Management approach. The research method used quantitative descriptive methods by distributing questionnaires to personnel at PT PIM's NPK Chemical Plant project. Questionnaire data is processed using SPSS programming. After that, a risk assessment analysis is carried out to obtain the dominant risk of delay. The results showed that the risk factors in the "high risk" category were 31 risks or contributed 84.67%. The 5 dominant risk factors that cause project delays are: Material delivery is not in accordance with sequential in the field; Mismanagement of the Contractor's project; Delays due to the work of subcontractors; Slow resource mobilization; and Poor coordination and communication between parts of the Contractor's work organization so that they cannot manage the work interface.

Keywords: Project Delay, Cost Overrun, Project Risk Management

Keywords

Keterlambatan Proyek, Cost Overrun, Project Risk Management

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anonim 1, 2017. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide), Sixth edition. ed. Project Management Institute, Inc, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania.

Anonim 2, 2013. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide), fifth edition. ed. Project Management Institute, Inc, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania.

Apriliyani, M.A., Amin, M., 2019. Analisis Keterlambatan Berbasis Manajemen Risiko Pada Proyek Warehouse Lazada Tahap 2 8, 11.

Ervianto, W.I., 1998. Kajian Praktis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Delay dalam Proyek Konstruksi. Laporan penelitian UAJY.

Fachrully Ade, A., Santoso, S., 2023. Delay Factor Analysis and Dynamic System Modeling on the EPC Project of Liquid Petreleum Gas Tank in Kupang. J. Res. Soc. Sci. Econ. Manag. 2. https://doi.org/10.36418/jrssem.v2i06.381

Hanafi, M.M., 2006. Manajemen Risiko, Pertama. ed. UPP STIM YKPN, Yogyakarta.

Hirman, M., Benesova, A., Steiner, F., Tupa, J., 2019. Project Management during the Industry 4.0 Implementation with Risk Factor Analysis. Procedia Manuf. 38, 1181–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.208

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., Mullen, M.R., 2008. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit 6.

Husen, A., 2011. Manajemen proyek (edisi kedua), Revisi. ed. Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.

Kangari, R., 1995. Risk management perceptions and trends of US construction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 121, 422–429.

Kerzner, H., 2017. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling, Twelfth edition. ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey.

Manning, M.L., Munro, D., 2007. The survey researcher’s SPSS cookbook. Pearson Education Australia.

Na Ayudhya, B.I., Kunishima, M., 2019. Assessment of Risk Management for Small Residential Projects in Thailand. Procedia Comput. Sci. 164, 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.200

Nabawy, M., Khodeir, L.M., 2021. Achieving efficiency in quantitative risk analysis process – Application on infrastructure projects. Ain Shams Eng. J. 12, 2303–2311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.032

Nicholas, J.M., 1990. Managing business and engineering projects : concepts and implementation. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice Hall.

Proboyo, B., 1999. Keterlambatan Waktu Pelaksanaan Proyek : Klasifikasi Dan Peringkat Dari Penyebab-Penyebabnya 1, 10.

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Müller, H., 2003. Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures 8.

Schumacker, R.E., Lomax, R.G., 2010. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 3rd ed. ed. Routledge, New York.

Setiawan, M.A., Sucita, I.K., Sarwono, B., 2021. Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Pada Proyek Konstruksi Gedung (Studi Kasus Proyek Apartemen Apple 3 Condovilla – Jakarta Selatan). Constr. Mater. J. 3, 197–205. https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v3i3.4132

Shibani, A., Hasan, D., Saaifan, J., Sabboubeh, H., Eltaip, M., Saidani, M., Gherbal, N., 2022. Financial risk management in the construction projects. J. King Saud Univ. - Eng. Sci. S1018363922000435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2022.05.001

Sujarweni, W., 2014. Metodologi Penelitian : Lengkap, Praktis, Dan Mudah Dipahami. Pustaka Baru Press, Yogyakarta.

Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., 2007. Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. ed. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, Boston.

Wesli, 2015. Metodelogi Penelitian Teknik Sipil. Yayasan PeNA Banda Aceh.

Wood, G.D., Ellis, R.C.T., 2003. Risk management practices of leading UK cost consultants. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 10, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980310489960

Yamin, S., 2023. Olah Data Statistik: SMARTPLS 3 SMARTPLS 4 AMOS & STATA, Series III. ed. PT Dewangga Energi Internasional.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29103/tj.v14i1.1034