Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Teras Jurnal is a journal that communicates the results of research within the scope of civil engineering and scientific development as well as aspects of practitioners. The process of manuscript submission is open throughout the year. All submitted manuscript will be screened with double-blind peer review and editorial review before they are accepted to publish. Teras Jurnal receives a manuscript from the following area below civil engineering science and development with the interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approach:

  • Building Materials and Structures
  • Constructions Technology
  • Constructions Economy and Management
  • Earthquake Engineering
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Renovation of Buildings
  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Highway Engineering
  • Hydraulic and Hydraulic Structures
  • Road and Bridge Engineering
  • Structural Engineering
  • Surveying and Geo-Spatial Engineering
  • Transportation Engineering
  • Tunnel Engineering
  • Urban Engineering and Economy
  • Water Resources Engineering
  • Urban Drainage

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

This statement of ethical codes of ethics is a statement of an ethical code of all parties involved in the process of publication of this scientific journal of managers, editors, Mitra Bestari, and authors/authors. This Code of Scientific Publication Ethics upholds three ethical values in the publication, namely Neutrality which is free from conflict of interest in the management of publications; Justice is to give the right of authorship to the author as author/author; and Honesty that is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in publication. The submitted manuscript will be reviewed by the Editor

Peer reviewers have the right to include multiple authors to encourage the quality of published manuscripts and editors for editorial policy decisions according to their respective expertise.

Peer reviewers should notify the editors of the will to review the manuscripts to be published. Otherwise, peer reviewers should notify their editors.

The manuscript under review is a confidential document. Communication with other parties without permission from the author is prohibited.

Peer reviewers should stick to the principle of objectivity and avoid personal criticism of the author of the manuscript during the review process. All comments must be accompanied by clear and supportive suggestions.

Peer Reviewer is recommended to provide information to the study author with relevant case studies, not edited, or substantially similar, or highly relevant, or overlap with the manuscript reviewed.

Peer reviewers are not permitted to use an unpublished manuscript material for personal use without the written consent of the author, under any circumstances.

The information and ideas contained in the text reviewed are confidential and should not be distributed or used for personal gain.

If there is a conflict of interest for reasons of competition, collaboration or other relationships with authors, institutions or companies involved in publication, peer reviewers are not permitted to evaluate related manuscripts.

In the review process, authors and reviewers should not disclose any information to each other. The review process is double-blind.

 

Publication Frequency

Published 2 times a year
March and September

Every publishing of 8 articles

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethic

Teras Jurnal is a peer-reviewed electronic journal. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal.

Plagiarism
Teras Jurnal is committed to publishing only original material, i.e., material that has neither been published elsewhere nor is under review elsewhere. Manuscripts that are found to have been plagiarized from a manuscript by other authors, whether published or unpublished, will incur plagiarism sanctions.

Editor

  • The editor of Teras Jurnal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
  • An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
  • The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
  • Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

 Authors

  • Authors should present an accurate account of the original research performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Researchers should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. A manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Manuscripts should follow the submission guidelines of the journal.
  • Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work. The manuscript should not be submitted concurrently to more than one publication unless the editors have agreed to co-publication. Relevant previous work and publications, both by other researchers and the authors’ own, should be properly acknowledged and referenced. The primary literature should be cited where possible. Original wording taken directly from publications by other researchers should appear in quotation marks with the appropriate citations.
  • The author should not, in general, submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. It is also expected that the author will not publish redundant manuscripts or manuscripts describing same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Multiple publications arising from a single research project should be clearly identified as such and the primary publication should be referenced
  • Authors should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
  • The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. Others who have made a significant contribution must be listed as co-authors. In cases where major contributors are listed as authors while those who made less substantial, or purely technical, contributions to the research or to the publication are listed in an acknowledgment section. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
  • All authors should clearly disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.  All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  • If the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript, then the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 Reviewers

  • Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
  • Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
  • Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.
  • Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  • Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  • Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.