Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Teras Jurnal is a journal that communicates the results of research within the scope of civil engineering and scientific development as well as aspects of practitioners. The process of manuscript submission is open throughout the year. All submitted manuscript will be screened with double-blind peer review and editorial review before they are accepted to publish. Teras Jurnal receives a manuscript from the following area below civil engineering science and development with the interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approach:

  • Building Materials and Structures
  • Constructions Technology
  • Constructions Economy and Management
  • Earthquake Engineering
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Renovation of Buildings
  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Highway Engineering
  • Hydraulic and Hydraulic Structures
  • Road and Bridge Engineering
  • Structural Engineering
  • Surveying and Geo-Spatial Engineering
  • Transportation Engineering
  • Tunnel Engineering
  • Urban Engineering and Economy
  • Water Resources Engineering
  • Urban Drainage

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

This statement of ethical codes of ethics is a statement of an ethical code of all parties involved in the process of publication of this scientific journal of managers, editors, Mitra Bestari, and authors/authors. This Code of Scientific Publication Ethics upholds three ethical values in the publication, namely Neutrality which is free from conflict of interest in the management of publications; Justice is to give the right of authorship to the author as author/author; and Honesty that is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in publication. The submitted manuscript will be reviewed by the Editor

Peer reviewers have the right to include multiple authors to encourage the quality of published manuscripts and editors for editorial policy decisions according to their respective expertise.

Peer reviewers should notify the editors of the will to review the manuscripts to be published. Otherwise, peer reviewers should notify their editors.

The manuscript under review is a confidential document. Communication with other parties without permission from the author is prohibited.

Peer reviewers should stick to the principle of objectivity and avoid personal criticism of the author of the manuscript during the review process. All comments must be accompanied by clear and supportive suggestions.

Peer Reviewer is recommended to provide information to the study author with relevant case studies, not edited, or substantially similar, or highly relevant, or overlap with the manuscript reviewed.

Peer reviewers are not permitted to use an unpublished manuscript material for personal use without the written consent of the author, under any circumstances.

The information and ideas contained in the text reviewed are confidential and should not be distributed or used for personal gain.

If there is a conflict of interest for reasons of competition, collaboration or other relationships with authors, institutions or companies involved in publication, peer reviewers are not permitted to evaluate related manuscripts.

In the review process, authors and reviewers should not disclose any information to each other. The review process is double-blind.

 

Publication Frequency

Published 2 times a year
March and September

Every publishing of 8 articles