Estimasi Emisi Karbon pada Pelaksanaan Konstruksi Cetak Sawah di Kecamatan Sebangau Kuala, Kabupaten Pulang Pisau

Authors

  • SUBRATA ADITAMA K.A.UDA UNIVERSITAS PALANGKA RAYA
  • Saritha Kittie Uda UNIVERSITAS PALANGKA RAYA
  • DEVIA UNIVERSITAS PALANGKA RAYA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/tj.v16i1.1338

Keywords:

Carbon Emissions (CO2), Rice Field Construction, Heavy Equipment and Materials

Abstract

Abstrak

 

Kegiatan konstruksi, termasuk pembangunan infrastruktur pertanian seperti cetak sawah, merupakan salah satu kontributor signifikan terhadap emisi gas rumah kaca (GRK), khususnya karbon dioksida (CO2). Konstruksi cetak sawah melibatkan serangkaian aktivitas, seperti pembukaan lahan, pengolahan tanah, transportasi material, dan operasi alat berat, yang berpotensi melepaskan karbon tersimpan, baik di atas permukaan (biomassa) maupun di dalam tanah (karbon tanah). Oleh karena itu, identifikasi potensi emisi karbon dari kegiatan ini menjadi sangat penting sebagai langkah awal dalam merumuskan strategi pembangunan pertanian yang berkelanjutan dan rendah karbon. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghitung estimasi emisi CO₂ yang dihasilkan oleh alat berat berdasarkan konsumsi bahan bakar, durasi operasi, dan faktor emisi serta material konstruksi yang digunakan. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa alat berat dengan konsumsi solar terbesar memberikan kontribusi tertinggi terhadap total emisi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan 96,47% emisi karbon dihasilkan dari penggunaan alat berat excavator, sedangkan sisanya berasal dari transportasi (0,13%) dan material konstruksi (3,40%). Emisi karbon yang dihasilkan sebagian besar dari konsumsi bahan bakar minyak (fosil) sehingga perlu adanya upaya meminimalisasi atau mengganti penggunaan bahan bakar fosil dengan energi terbarukan dan ramah lingkungan.  

 

Kata Kunci: Emisi Karbon (CO2), Konstruksi Cetak sawah, alat berat dan material

 

Abstract

Construction activities, including the development of agricultural infrastructure such as rice field cultivation, are a significant contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2). Rice field construction involves a series of activities, such as land clearing, soil cultivation, material transportation, and heavy equipment operation, which have the potential to release stored carbon, both above ground (biomass) and in the soil (soil carbon). Therefore, identifying the potential carbon emissions from these activities is very important as a first step in formulating sustainable and low-carbon agricultural development strategies. This study aims to calculate the estimated CO₂ emissions generated by heavy equipment based on fuel consumption, duration of operation, and emission factors and construction materials used. The results show that heavy equipment with the highest diesel consumption contributes the most to total emissions. The results show that 96.47% of carbon emissions are generated from the use of excavators, while the rest comes from transportation (0.13%) and construction materials (3.40%). Carbon emissions are mostly generated from the consumption of fossil fuels, so efforts are needed to minimize or replace the use of fossil fuels with renewable and environmentally friendly energy.  

 

Keywords: Carbon Emissions (CO2), Rice Field Construction, Heavy Equipment and Materials

References

Agung Wibowo, M., Uda, S. A. K. A., & Zhabrinna. (2018). Reducing carbon emission in construction base on project life cycle (PLC). MATEC Web of Conferences, 195, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819506002

Agus, F., Gunarso, P., Sahardjo, B. H., Harris, N., Noordwijk, M. Van, & Killeen, T. J. (2013). Historical Co2 Emissions From Land Use and Land Use Change From the Oil Palm Industry in Indonesia , Malaysia and Papua New Guinea. Reports from the Technical Panels of RSPOs 2nd Greenhouse Gas Working Group, 65–88. http://www.rspo.org/file/GHGWG2/5_historical_CO2_emissions_Agus_et_al.pdf

Ariani, M., Hanudin, E., & Haryono, E. (2021). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice Fields in Indonesia: Challenges for Future Research and Development. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 53(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.22146/IJG.55681

Arunrat, N., Pumijumnong, N., Sereenonchai, S., Chareonwong, U., & Wang, C. (2021). Comparison of GHG emissions and farmers’ profit of large-scale and individual farming in rice production across four regions of Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123945

Bhattacharyya, P., Sarkar, B., & Roy, K. S. (2024). Editorial: New generation agronomy for net-zero greenhouse gas emissions. Frontiers in Agronomy, 6(June), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2024.1441041

Dirjenbinkon. (2025). Tata Cara Penyusunan Perkiraan Biaya Pekerjaan Konstruksi Bidang Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (1st ed.). https://sijkt.pu.go.id/o/SE-Dirjen-30-2025

Ditjend PSP Kementan. (2025). Petunjuk Teknis Cetak Sawah Tahun Anggaran 2025o Title (1st ed.). Ditjend PSP Kementan.

Dyla Midya Octavia, & Dede Kurnia Putra. (2022). Produktivitas Dan Emisi Alat Berat. Ensiklopedia of Journal PRODUKTIVITAS, 4(4), 169–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v4i4.1216

Hammond, G. P., & Jone, C. I. (2008). Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE) Version 1.6a. The University of Bath, 1–64. www.bath.ac.uk/mech-eng/sert/embodied/%0Ahttp://www.ecocem.ie/downloads/Inventory_of_Carbon_and_Energy.pdf

He, Y., Wu, Y., & Yang, X. (2025). Effective reduction of agricultural carbon emissions via land-use- structure adjustment: A case study of Sichuan Province, Southwest China. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 23(3), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2025.07.009

Hooijer, A., Page, S., Canadell, J. G., Silvius, M., Kwadijk, J., Wösten, H., & Jauhiainen, J. (2010). Current and future CO 2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences, 7(5), 1505–1514. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1505-2010

IPCC. (2006). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, 20.

IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_full.pdf

Jin, J.-H., Jeong, H.-C., Lee, S.-I., Lee, H.-S., Park, H.-R., Yu, Y.-S., Lee, J.-M., Lee, Y.-H., & Gown, H.-S. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emission of Rice Cultivation under Minimum Tillage in the Gimje, South Korea. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 56(4), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.7745/kjssf.2023.56.4.300

Karlsson, I., Rootzén, J., Johnsson, F., & Erlandsson, M. (2021). Achieving net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains – A multidimensional analysis of residential building systems. Developments in the Built Environment, 8(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100059

Krantz, J., Larsson, J., Lu, W., & Olofsson, T. (2015). Assessing embodied energy and greenhouse gas emissions in infrastructure projects. Buildings, 5(4), 1156–1170. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5041156

Liu, H., Miao, Y., Chen, Y., Shen, Y., You, Y., Wang, Z., & Gang, C. (2025). Responses of soil greenhouse gas fluxes to land management in forests and grasslands: A global meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 967(February), 178773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178773

Murdiyarso, D., Hergoualc’H, K., & Verchot, L. V. (2010). Opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in tropical peatlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(46), 19655–19660. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911966107

Smith, P., Adams, J., Beerling, D. J., Beringer, T., Calvin, K. V., Fuss, S., Griscom, B., Hagemann, N., Kammann, C., Kraxner, F., Minx, J. C., Popp, A., Renforth, P., Vicente Vicente, J. L., & Keesstra, S. (2019). Land-Management Options for Greenhouse Gas Removal and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Services and the Sustainable Development Goals. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44, 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033129

Torgal, F. P., & Said Jalali. (2014). Eco-efficient Construction and Building Materials: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Eco-Labelling and Case Studies (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-892-8

Wang, J., Luo, M., Ding, R., Wilkes, A., Wang, S., & Xiao, W. (2017). Study on GHG emission effects of ecological engineering measures in a land consolidation project: A Chinese case. ZFV - Zeitschrift Fur Geodasie, Geoinformation Und Landmanagement, 142(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.12902/zfv-0154-2016

Yang, Y., Gong, R., Pan, X., Li, X., Hua, Z., Ma, J., Duan, X., & Chen, F. (2024). How Dryland-to-Paddy Conversion Affects the Carbon Emission Efficiency in the Short Term: Evidence from Soil Carbon-Fixing Bacteria and the Carbon Pool in an Experimental Study. Agriculture (Switzerland), 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122151

Yao, S., Zhang, S., & Zhang, X. (2019). Renewable energy, carbon emission and economic growth: A revised environmental Kuznets Curve perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1338–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.069

Yu, M., Wiedmann, T., Crawford, R., & Tait, C. (2017). The Carbon Footprint of Australia’s Construction Sector. Procedia Engineering, 180, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.180

Zhang, X., & Wang, F. (2016). Assessment of embodied carbon emissions for building construction in China: Comparative case studies using alternative methods. Energy and Buildings, 130, 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.080

Zhao, Q., Wu, Z., Yu, Y., Wang, T., & Huang, S. (2025). Exploring Carbon Emissions in the Construction Industry: A Review of Accounting Scales, Boundaries, Trends, and Gaps. Buildings, 15(11), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111900

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

K.A.UDA, S. A., Kittie Uda , S. and DEVIA (2026) “Estimasi Emisi Karbon pada Pelaksanaan Konstruksi Cetak Sawah di Kecamatan Sebangau Kuala, Kabupaten Pulang Pisau”, Teras Jurnal : Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 16(1), pp. 195–206. doi: 10.29103/tj.v16i1.1338.