Kajian Putusan Pengadilan yang Membatalkan Putusan Arbitrase BANI pada Sengketa Kontrak Jasa Konstruksi

Putri Cahya Pertiwi; Arief Setiawan Budi Nugroho; Richo Andi Wibowo

doi:10.29103/tj.v14i2.1148

Kajian Putusan Pengadilan yang Membatalkan Putusan Arbitrase BANI pada Sengketa Kontrak Jasa Konstruksi

Putri Cahya Pertiwi, Arief Setiawan Budi Nugroho, Richo Andi Wibowo

Abstract

Abstrak

Penyelesaian sengketa kontrak konstruksi melalui arbitrase BANI pada kenyataannya tidak selalu memberikan putusan yang dapat diterima oleh para pihak yang berselisih. Dalam beberapa kasus, putusan BANI bahkan dibatalkan oleh Pengadilan. Penelitian ini mengkaji 35 putusan BANI yang diajukan permohonan pembatalan ke Pengadilan Negeri selama periode 2010 hingga 2022. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 14 putusan BANI dibatalkan oleh Pengadilan sehubungan dengan penilaian hakim yang menyatakan bahwa Arbiter kurang cermat dalam mendeteksi keberadaan unsur tipuan dalam perkara. Sementara itu kajian mendalam terhadap dua kasus pembatalan putusan BANI oleh Pengadilan menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan Hakim Pengadilan dalam menilai keabsahan dokumen yang menjadi sengketa dalam kontrak konstruksi dan mendeteksi adanya kecurangan lebih cermat dibandingkan Arbiter BANI. Namun demikian, Arbiter BANI relatif lebih baik dibanding Hakim Pengadilan dalam menilai substansi permasalahan kontrak konstruksi dan memahami permasalahan sengketanya.

Kata kunci: Arbitrase, BANI, Keadilan, Kelembagaan yang Tangguh, Pembatalan Putusan, Pengadilan

Abstract

The resolution of construction contract disputes through BANI does not always result in decisions that are acceptable to the conflicting parties. In some cases, BANI decisions have even been overturned by the courts. This study examined 35 BANI decisions that were challenged in District Courts during the period from 2010 to 2022. The research findings indicate that 14 BANI decisions were overturned by the courts due to the judges' assessment, which stated that the Arbitrators were insufficiently diligent in detecting elements of fraud in the case. Furthermore, an in-depth review of two cases in which BANI decisions were overturned by the courts indicated that the ability of the court judges to assess the validity of the documents in construction contract disputes and detect fraud was more accurate than that of the BANI Arbitrators. Nevertheless, the BANI Arbitrators were relatively better than the Court Judges in evaluating the substance of construction contract issues and understanding the dispute issues.

Keywords: Arbitration, BANI, Justice, Strong Institutions, Cancellation of Judgment, Courts

Keywords

Arbitration, BANI, Justice, Strong Institutions, Cancellation of Judgment, Courts

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abwunza, A.A., Peter, T.K., and Muigua, K., 2021. Explaining Time Performance of Construction Arbitration. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 13 (2).

Al-Humaidi, H.M., 2014. Arbitration in Kuwait: Study of Current Practices and Suggestions for Improvements. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 6 (1).

Al-Zwainy, F.M.S., Jaber, F.K., and Hachem, S.W., 2018. Diagnostic of the claims and disputes between the contractor and owner in construction project using narrative analysis approach. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9 (12), 619–626.

Azzanira, Annalisa Y, and Syaifuddin, M., 2018. Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 30/1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 3 (1), 50–60.

Budiman, M., 2016. Problematika Penerapan Pasal 2 dan 18 Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 9 (3), 303–315.

FIDIC, 1999. Conditions of Contract for Construction.

Francis, M., Ramachandra, T., and Perera, S., 2022. Disputes in Construction Projects: A Perspective of Project Characteristics. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 14 (2).

Hansen, S., 2017. Investigation on the Characteristics and Critical Success Factors of Constructive Acceleration Claim in Indonesian Construction Industry. In: Conference: 5th International Conference on Agricultural, Environmental and Civil Engineering (AECE 2017) At: Phuket, Thailand.

Hansen, S., 2019. Challenging Arbitral Awards in the Construction Industry: Case Study of Infrastructure Disputes. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 11 (1).

Henuk, Y.G., Nugraha, P., and Andi, A., 2016. Studi Mengenai Directed Changes dan Constructive Changes pada Proyek Bangunan Tinggi di Surabaya. Dimensi Utama Teknik Sipil, 3 (2), 23–30.

Hulmanpanjaitan, O. 2018. Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Tô-râ, 4, 29–34.

Indramanik and Gede, B. ida, 2017. FIDIC dan Kontrak Konstruksi di Indonesia. Jurusan Teknik Gradien, 9 (1), 123–144.

KaraŞahin, Y., 2020. Contractual Time Limits to Commence Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 37 (2), 209–256.

Koc, K. and Gurgun, A.P., 2022. Ambiguity factors in construction contracts entailing conflicts. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29 (5), 1946–1964.

Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Indonesia, 2018. Peraturan LKPP Nomor 18 Tahun 2018 tentang Layanan Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.

Lewa, S.D.P. and Setiawan, H., 2017. Konflik antara Kontraktor dan Pemilik Proyek yang Berpotensi Menimbulkan Klaim. 121–130.

Mishra, A.K. and Aithal, P.S., 2022. Effectiveness of Arbitration in Construction Projects. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences, 96–111.

Oberlyn Simanjuntak, J., Simanjuntak, S., Lumbangaol, P., and Agnes, A., 2021. Analisa Kontrak Proyek Konstruksi di Indonesia. Jurnal Visi Eksakta (JVIEKS), 2 (2), 205–214.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 22 tahun 2020 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 tahun 2017 tentang Jasa Konstruksi.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2000 tentang Penyelenggaraan Jasa Konstruksi.

Retnawati, H., 2016. Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Rismanbaf, A., Sanatjoo, A., and Heidari, G., 2022. Analysis of the Concept of “Document” from the Perspective of the Tradition of Documentation and Neo-Documentation. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 38 (1), 1–30.

Simanjuntak, E., 2019. Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16 (1), 83.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Jasa Konstruksi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.

Wu, D., Fan, S., and Li, X., 2021. The Identification, Classification and Application of Library Science Research Methods in Chinese Context. Journal of Library Science in China, 47 (5), 33–47.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29103/tj.v14i2.1148